Tuesday, January 25, 2011

3.3, due January 26

I've seen the term 'isomorphism" before in some of my other math and math ed classes, but the term "homomorphism" was new to me.  I was a little surprised to see that being isomorphic depended on a bijective function.   It makes sense that it does, but my understanding of isomorphisms was minimal and I  thought two things were said to be isomorphic if they were similar properties like how triangles are similar in angle size.  A bijective function requires this to be true; it's a stronger more sophisticated way of putting it. One question I had while reading was is an isomorphism a function or something like a set or a ring?  THe book uses noth terms but I wasn't srue how to think about it.My first thought about homomorphisms was that they would be different than an isomorphism, but they aren't.  Every isomorphism is a homomorphism, but just a square is a rectangle and a rectangle is not a square, not every homomorphism is not an isomorphism.  Conviently when proving that something is an isomorphism, you prove that it is an homomorphism.

No comments:

Post a Comment